Counter

religiousragings: hookahandhappiness: Rule 34... - Sweeten Up ✌

religiousragings:

hookahandhappiness:

Rule 34 states that if it exists there must be a porn of it.

I’ve seen my fair share of Rule 34 and some with Jesus on it.

Therefor Jesus exists.

Checkmate atheists 

DAMN IT!!  They won.  :(

(Source: juanmayer)


74 notes
reblogged from skepticalavenger
originally posted by juanmayer

  1. schysmata reblogged this from skepticalavenger and added:
    On the bright side so does Zevran from Dragon Age… I am gonna go get me some of that.
  2. jasonkruger1313 reblogged this from skepticalavenger
  3. lietenantdanicecream reblogged this from chocolate-covered
  4. idrawrobots reblogged this from dragyrn and added:
    http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/checkmate-atheists good job
  5. lost-carcosa reblogged this from skepticalavenger
  6. sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from pepperpatrol
  7. lophant reblogged this from keylimepie
  8. mccallmefromhale reblogged this from skepticalavenger and added:
    LOL pretty funny and even though I know it’s a joke, it’s still fair to point out that the existence of Harry Potter...
  9. quotablefilms reblogged this from foodfaithandfitspo and added:
    no, because this is st. anslams ontological arguement, and some person argues that just because you can concieve of...
  10. chocolate-covered reblogged this from skepticalavenger
  11. thehufflepuffwholeaptthroughtime reblogged this from keylimepie and added:
    Yeah, where’s my Totodile? :(
  12. keylimepie reblogged this from tetraghost and added:
    By that logic Pokemon exist. Where the fuck is my eevee?
  13. letitberandom reblogged this from lekgolo
  14. rikealoas7 reblogged this from tetraghost and added:
    quite a disturbing victory .__.
  15. darkthoughtsbrightdays reblogged this from imcoolerthanyourmum
  16. pepperpatrol reblogged this from skepticalavenger and added:
    But…We always knew (or at least suspected) Jesus existed. This proves nothing! God is still a concept!
  17. ikkimikki reblogged this from skepticalavenger
  18. jcporter1 reblogged this from divathranduil
  19. velvetsnuffy reblogged this from badboyjiyong
  20. badboyjiyong reblogged this from fluttershy
  21. icate-ousite reblogged this from tandemtricycle
  22. tandemtricycle reblogged this from skepticalavenger
  23. sillyfeather reblogged this from skepticalavenger and added:
    Perfect logic is perfect.
  24. thiscatisalandmine reblogged this from nopietyjustpieandtea and added:
    statements do not have to apply both ways. For example If I am hungry, I will eat. This is true. If I eat, I am hungry....
  25. lekgolo reblogged this from imcoolerthanyourmum